Is it Possible to Prove a Research Hypothesis?

Is it possible to prove a research hypothesis? In short, no. You cannot prove a research hypothesis, and I shall explain. In psychology, and arguably science as well, nothing can ever be proven, only supported (1). There is no doubt that your research results either support your hypothesis or are completely opposite to it, yet this is not proof. Even if there are a multitude of other studies that also support your findings, the research hypothesis still hasn’t been proven. It only takes one piece of evidence to throw all previous findings out of the water, as this one piece of contradictory evidence could raise so many questions about the previous research: was it reliable? Were the data valid? Why are these findings different?

Without findings contradicting research, we would not have had the paradigms we have had in the past. A paradigm is a novel thought or theory in an area that is different to a previous one. Paradigms occur because of a few finding, new research techniques, or even just simply a different way of looking at things (2). Famous paradigms in the past include those of the move from positivism to critical theory, and the move from Freudianism to developmental ideas. As research develops, and experiments are becoming more valid and more reliable, paradigm shifts are occurring. We are learning more about the brain and its effects on our actions, so there is a shift towards neurological research, as opposed to evolutionary research, for example.

In psychology, humans are such complicated individuals with so many differences between us. Therefore, one finding can never be applied to all of us, and hence the finding cannot be proved, as there is a large chance that at least one of us will be an exception to that theory. However, does this means our theories are not yet refined enough, or are humans too complicated to have an overall research hypothesis?

Don’t get me wrong, research support is exceptionally important, yet proof is impossible. With humans, there is no scientific or mathematical proof that can be written and applied to us all, like there can be applied to gravity and the speeds of light and sound. So therefore, a research hypothesis cannot be proved, and disproof in the past has led to the paradigm shifts shaping the world of research today.

  1. Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson & Co.
  2. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Is it Possible to Prove a Research Hypothesis?

  1. ecstatsic says:

    Hiya. This was a well-written blog that neatly summarised your argument 🙂
    I will not argue with anything that you have said, but merely (hopefully) add to your argument somewhat. You mentioned that we can never prove anything in psychology, as the human mind is so complex. Some might wonder if we can prove things in a much smaller and simpler organism, perhaps in bacteria. Surely we can prove that antibiotics can fight bacterial infections? No, we cannot as bacteria have developed falsified such theories by mutating to become drug resistant.
    Science can never be proven, as you so rightly said 🙂

  2. psychmja1 says:

    I agree with you that it is not possible to prove anything in psychology, merely provide evidence to support it. If we can never prove then surely we can never disprove either. However, in future we are more likely to prove some theories than others. For example, biopsychology is much more easy to find evidence for. Yet, it’s hardly right to say that we could prove a Freudian theory as it is based on unconscious thoughts and feelings (hypothetical constructs) that we can never directly study. I suppose this is where I bring in the whole psychology as a science debate. You could argue that psychology can never be a science as the aim of a science is to falsify a hypothesis, which in psychology we can never do. This is one of those debates that could go on forever so to sum up, no we can never prove anything in psychology as nothing is ever certain 🙂

  3. Pingback: Comments for my TA « psychmja1

  4. psud2d says:

    I think this blog post hit the matter right on the nose. While it’s true we can never really prove a hypothesis, I think you did a brilliant job of going into the reasons in depth rather than with a quick sentence about it. You’ve made some brilliant points here, well done.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s